"Strange" at Berkeley Art Museum (reprinted from East Bay Monthly, October 2019)

Spacy Oddities

 “The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.” Strange, a vast exhibition that draws on the Berkeley Art Museum’s extensive collection, ratifies biologist JBS Haldane’s aperçu, while extolling creative subjectivity and the artistic imagination, both disparaged in recent years as, respectively, illusory (since individuality is a myth) and compromised by its ostensible service to power. Postmodernist groupthink had a good run—until it collided with the iceberg of global capitalism and climate change. (Welcome to surrealist hell, eggheads.)

Surrealism, long considered by formalist critics a deplorable aesthetic misadventure, has regained credibility in our stranger-than-fiction, mad-Tea-Party times. Strange postulates that the surrealist impulse predates and postdates the movement’s glory years from approximately 1920 to 1940; that the human psyche’s embrace of the mythic, fantastic, and dreamlike—le merveilleux, in Surrealist terminology—even the nightmarish, is eternal.

Two Berkeley artists set the tone. A bronze sculpture by Stephen De Staebler evokes an excavated archaeological find, barely recognizable as a winged human, symbolizing the soul’s freedom, broken but unbowed. De Staebler exemplifies the “tragic humanism” that BAM’s founding director, the late Peter Selz, championed in the late 1950s. A haunted melting landscape by Ariel Parkinson, “The Inner Wilderness‑Shaman (Forest)” depicts the subconscious mind as a riot of tendrils and creepers, with life finding a way. (Sara Kathryn Arledge’s “Stellar Garden” might almost be a pendant.)

 Divided into thematically organized galleries—Myth and Magic, Inside/Outside, Dreams and Visions, etc.—the show’s very size causes it to lose focus when it considers contemporary artists, some of whom prioritize sociopolitical aims and/or artistic eccentricity over personal vision. (I take issue issue with some of the curatorial editorializing, too.) But the museum’s vaults treasures more than compensate for a few aesthetic divagations. Don’t miss, amid the embarras of celebrity-artist richesses (Arneson, Bellmer, Blake, Bourgeois, Conner, Cornell, Doig, Dürer, Goya, Hesse, Hogarth, Magritte), works by Lesley Dill, Sylvia Fein, Ernst Fuchs, Robert Gonzales, Nancy Grossman, Higgs and Ranson, Anton Lehmden, and Jill Sylvia.

 Strange runs through January 5, 2020; Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive, 2155 Center Street, Berkeley, 510/642-0808; bampfa.org. —DeWitt Cheng

views
1 response
hi dewitt, whose painting is this? ____________________________________ Tami S. Tsark studio@tsark.com 415.519.8264 • LinkedIn• Professional Portfolio • Instagram • Art Portfolio On Sunday, September 29, 2019, 12:34:20 PM PDT, Posthaven Posts wrote: -- Reply above this line to comment on this post --Dewitt Cheng createda new post on artopticon.us: "Strange" at Berkeley Art Museum (reprinted from East Bay Monthly, October 2019) Spacy Oddities  “Theuniverse is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we canimagine.” Strange, a vast exhibition that draws on the Berkeley ArtMuseum’s extensive collection, ratifies biologist JBS Haldane’s aperçu,while extolling creative subjectivity and the artistic imagination, both disparagedin recent years as, respectively, illusory (since individuality is a myth) andcompromised by its ostensible service to power. Postmodernist groupthink had agood run—until it collided with the iceberg of global capitalism and climatechange. (Welcome to surrealist hell, eggheads.) Surrealism, long considered by formalist critics adeplorable aesthetic misadventure, has regained credibility in ourstranger-than-fiction, mad-Tea-Party times. Strange postulates that thesurrealist impulse predates and postdates the movement’s glory years fromapproximately 1920 to 1940; that the human psyche’s embrace of the mythic,fantastic, and dreamlike—le merveilleux, in Surrealist terminology—even thenightmarish, is eternal. Two Berkeley artists set the tone. A bronzesculpture by Stephen De Staebler evokes an excavated archaeological find,barely recognizable as a winged human, symbolizing the soul’s freedom, brokenbut unbowed. De Staebler exemplifies the “tragic humanism” that BAM’s foundingdirector, the late Peter Selz, championed in the late 1950s. A haunted meltinglandscape by Ariel Parkinson, “The Inner Wilderness‑Shaman (Forest)” depictsthe subconscious mind as a riot of tendrils and creepers, with life finding away. (Sara Kathryn Arledge’s “Stellar Garden” might almost be a pendant.)  Divided into thematically organized galleries—Mythand Magic, Inside/Outside, Dreams and Visions, etc.—the show’s very size causesit to lose focus when it considers contemporary artists, some of whomprioritize sociopolitical aims and/or artistic eccentricity over personalvision. (I take issue issue with some of the curatorial editorializing, too.) Butthe museum’s vaults treasures more than compensate for a few aestheticdivagations. Don’t miss, amid the embarras of celebrity-artist richesses(Arneson, Bellmer, Blake, Bourgeois, Conner, Cornell, Doig, Dürer, Goya, Hesse,Hogarth, Magritte), works by Lesley Dill, Sylvia Fein, Ernst Fuchs, RobertGonzales, Nancy Grossman, Higgs and Ranson, Anton Lehmden, and Jill Sylvia.  Strange runsthrough January 5, 2020; Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive, 2155 CenterStreet, Berkeley, 510/642-0808; bampfa.org. —DeWitt Cheng View the post and reply » Unsubscribe from new posts on this site Change your Posthaven email settings